UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]     Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2015

[  ]     Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 0-22773

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

24025 Park Sorrento, Suite 410, Calabasas, CA 91302
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(818) 222-9195 / (818) 222-9197
(Issuer’s telephone/facsimile numbers, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes [  ] No [X]

The issuer had 10,458,250 shares of its $.01 par value Common Stock and no Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of February 8, 2016.

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The Company designs, develops, markets, and exports proprietary software products to customers in the automobile financing and leasing, banking, healthcare, and financial services industries worldwide. The Company also provides system integration, consulting, and IT products and services in exchange for fees from customers.

The consolidated condensed interim financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015. The Company follows the same accounting policies in preparation of interim reports. Results of operations for the interim periods are not indicative of annual results.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NetSol Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as follows:

Wholly owned Subsidiaries
NetSol Technologies Americas, Inc. (“NTA”)
NetSol Connect (Private), Ltd. (“Connect”)
NetSol Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. (“Australia”)
NetSol Technologies Europe Limited (“NTE”)
NetSol Technologies Limited (“NetSol UK”)

NTPK (Thailand) Co. Limited (“NTPK Thailand”)

NetSol Technologies Thailand Limited (“NetSol Thai”)

NetSol Technologies (Beijing) Co. Ltd. (“NetSol Beijing”)

NetSol Omni (Private) Ltd. (“Omni”)

NetSol Technologies (GmbH) (“NTG”)

Majority-owned Subsidiaries
NetSol Technologies, Ltd. (“NetSol PK”)
NetSol Innovation (Private) Limited (“NetSol Innovation”)
Virtual Lease Services Holdings Limited (“VLSH”)
Virtual Lease Services Limited (“VLS”)
Virtual Lease Services (Ireland) Limited (“VLSIL”)

For comparative purposes, prior year’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to report classifications of the current year.

NOTE 2 – ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash includes cash on hand and demand deposits in accounts maintained within the United States as well as in foreign countries. Certain financial instruments, which subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist of cash and restricted cash. The Company maintains balances at financial institutions which, from time to time, may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits for the banks located in the Unites States. Balances at financial institutions within certain foreign countries are not covered by insurance. As of December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015, the Company had uninsured deposits related to cash deposits in accounts maintained within foreign entities of approximately $11,474,155 and $8,969,443, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

The Company’s operations are carried out globally. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments of each country and by the general state of the country’s economy. The Company’s operations in each foreign country are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in economically developed nations. These include risks associated with, among others, the political, economic and legal environments and foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other things. Also, due to the current economic conditions in China and challenges being faced by the Chinese economy, the Company may face a risk of reduction in future revenue growth and non-collection of receivables from the customers in China.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most current revenue recognition guidance. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the new revenue standard by one year, which will make it effective for the Company in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (ASU 2014-12). The guidance applies to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. For all entities, the amendments in this update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The effective date is the same for both public business entities and all other entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-12 on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entities Ability to Continue as a Going Concern(ASU 2014-15). The guidance in ASU 2014-15 sets forth management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern as well as required disclosures. ASU 2014-15 indicates that, when preparing financial statements for interim and annual financial statements, management should evaluate whether conditions or events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This evaluation should include consideration of conditions and events that are either known or are reasonably knowable at the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued, as well as whether it is probable that management’s plans to address the substantial doubt will be implemented and, if so, whether it is probable that the plans will alleviate the substantial doubt. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods and annual periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01, Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual items (Subtopic 225-20), Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (ASU 2015-01). The amendment eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. This guidance is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted and allows the Company to apply the amendment prospectively or retrospectively. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU No. 2015-02 provides amendments to respond to stakeholders’ concerns about the current accounting for consolidation of certain legal entities. Stakeholders expressed concerns that GAAP might require a reporting entity to consolidate another legal entity in situations in which the reporting entity’s contractual rights do not give it the ability to act primarily on its own behalf, the reporting entity does not hold a majority of the legal entity’s voting rights, or the reporting entity is not exposed to a majority of the legal entity’s economic benefits or obligations. ASU No. 2015-02 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU No. 2015-03 provides guidance that will require debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. ASU No. 2015-03 affects disclosures related to debt issuance costs but does not affect existing recognition and measurement guidance for these items. ASU No. 2015-03 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangements. ASU No. 2015-05 provides guidance on a customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement, which includes software as a service, platform as a service, infrastructure as a service, and other similar hosting arrangements. ASU No. 2015-05 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

In September 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805) Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” ASU No. 2015-06 simplifies the accounting for measurement-period adjustments attributable to an acquisition. Under prior guidance, adjustments to provisional amounts during the measurement period that arise due to new information regarding acquisition date circumstances must be made retrospectively with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. The amended guidance requires an acquirer to record adjustments to provisional amounts made during the measurement period in the period that the adjustment is determined. The adjustments should reflect the impact on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as if the accounting had been completed as of the acquisition date. Additionally, amounts recorded in the current period that would have been reflected in prior reporting periods if the adjustments had been recognized as of the acquisition date must be disclosed either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to financial statements. This guidance is effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and early application is permitted. The impact of the guidance on our financial condition, results of operations and financial statement disclosures will depend on the level of acquisition activity performed by the Company.

In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (ASU 2015-17), which changes how deferred taxes are classified on the balance sheet and is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2015-17 requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as non-current. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (ASU 2016-01), which requires equity investments that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income and updates certain presentation and disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-01 is effective beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

NOTE 3 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include outstanding stock options, warrants, and stock awards.

The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:

The following potential dilutive shares were excluded from the shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

NOTE 4 – OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND FOREIGN CURRENCY:

The accounts of NTE, NetSol UK, VLSH and VLS use the British Pound; VLSIL and NTG use the Euro; NetSol PK, Connect, Omni and NetSol Innovation use the Pakistan Rupee; NTPK Thailand and NetSol Thai use the Thai Baht; Australia uses the Australian dollar; and NetSol Beijing uses the Chinese Yuan as the functional currencies. NetSol Technologies, Inc., and its subsidiary, NTA, use the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, and operating results are translated at the average exchange rate throughout the period. Accumulated translation losses classified as an item of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheet were $18,546,296 and $17,167,100 as of December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2015, comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations included translation loss of $415,996 and $1,379,196, respectively. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations included translation income of $726,129 and a loss of $1,229,425, respectively.

NOTE 5 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

NetSol-Innovation

In November 2004, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with the Innovation Group called NetSol-Innovation (Pvt) Ltd., (“NetSol-Innovation”), a Pakistani company. NetSol-Innovation provides support services to the Innovation Group. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2015, NetSol-Innovation provided services of $2,128,727 and $4,026,526, respectively. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, NetSol-Innovation provided services of $1,354,476 and $2,750,476, respectively. Accounts receivable at December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015 were $5,364,128 and $3,226,733, respectively.

Investec Asset Finance

In October 2011, NTE entered into an agreement with the Investec Asset Finance to acquire VLS. NTE and VLS both provide support services to Investec. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2015, NTE and VLS provided maintenance and services of $538,703 and $986,543, respectively. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, NTE and VLS provided maintenance and services of $242,704 and $531,694, respectively. Accounts receivable at December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015 were $385,395 and $265,166, respectively.

NOTE 6 – OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Other current assets consisted of the following:

NOTE 7 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

For the three and six months ended December 31, 2015, depreciation expense totaled $1,060,216 and $2,124,105, respectively. Of these amounts, $774,600 and $1,547,317, respectively, are reflected in cost of revenues. For the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, depreciation expense totaled $1,360,652 and $2,729,359, respectively. Of these amounts, $932,063 and $1,850,955, respectively, are reflected in cost of revenues.

Following is a summary of fixed assets held under capital leases as of December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015:

NOTE 8 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

(A) Product Licenses

Product licenses include internally developed original license issues, renewals, enhancements, copyrights, trademarks, and trade names. Product licenses are amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective lives, and the unamortized amount of $20,877,711 will be amortized over the next 8.25 years. Amortization expense for the three and six months ended December 31, 2015 was $686,866 and $1,388,384, respectively. Amortization expense for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014 was $868,690 and $1,751,365, respectively.

(B) Future Amortization

Estimated amortization expense of intangible assets over the next five years is as follows:

NOTE 9 – GOODWILL

Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in businesses combinations. Goodwill was comprised of the following amounts:

The Company tests for goodwill impairment at each reporting unit. There was no goodwill impairment for the period ended December 31, 2015.

NOTE 10 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following:

NOTE 11 – DEBTS

Notes payable and capital leases consisted of the following:

(1) The Company finances Directors’ and Officers’ (“D&O”) liability insurance as well as Errors and Omissions (“E&O”) liability insurance, for which the total balances are renewed on an annual basis and as such are recorded in current maturities. The interest rate on the insurance financing was 0.35% and 0.49% as of December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively.

(2) In October 2011, the Company’s subsidiary, NTE, entered into a loan agreement with HSBC Bank to finance the acquisition of 51% of a controlling interest in Virtual Leasing Services Limited. HSBC Bank guaranteed the loan up to a limit of £1,000,000, or approximately $1,480,166 for a period of 5 years with monthly payments of £18,420, or approximately $27,265. The interest rate was 4% which is 3.5% above the bank sterling base rate. The loan is securitized against a debenture comprising of fixed and floating charges over all the assets and undertakings of NTE including all present and future freehold and leasehold property, book and other debts, chattels, goodwill and uncalled capital, both present and future. Interest expense for the three and six months ended December 31, 2015 was $1,161 and $9,011, respectively. Interest expense for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014 was $13,248 and $29,950, respectively.

This facility requires that NTE’s adjusted tangible net worth would not be less than £600,000. For this purpose, adjusted tangible net worth means shareholders’ funds less intangible assets plus non-redeemable preference shares. In addition, NTE’s cash debt service coverage would not fall below 150% of the aggregate debt service cost. As of December 31, 2015, NTE was in compliance with this covenant.

(3) The Company’s subsidiary, NetSol PK, has an export refinance facility with Askari Bank Limited, secured by NetSol PK’s assets. This is a revolving loan that matures every six months. Total facility amount is Rs. 300,000,000 or approximately $2,824,859. The interest rate for the loans was 4.5% and 7.5% at December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively. Interest expense for the three and six months ended December 31, 2015 was $36,980 and $77,986, respectively. Interest expense for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014 was $37,068 and $72,775, respectively.

Export refinance facility from Askari Bank Limited amounting to Rupees 300 million ($2.82 million) require NetSol PK to maintain a long term debt equity ratio of 60:40 and the current ratio of 1:1. As of December 31, 2015, NetSol PK was in compliance with this covenant.

(4) In March 2014, the Company’s subsidiary, VLS, entered into a loan agreement with Investec. The loan amount was £150,000, or approximately $222,025, for a period of two years with annual payments of £75,000, or approximately $111,012. The interest rate was 3.13%. As of December 31, 2015, VLS has used this facility up to $128,647 including interest due, and was shown as a current maturity.

(5) The Company leases various fixed assets under capital lease arrangements expiring in various years through 2018. The assets and liabilities under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the asset. The assets are secured by the assets themselves. Depreciation of assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense for the three and six months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Following is the aggregate minimum future lease payments under capital leases as of December 31, 2015:

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 22,500 shares of common stock for services rendered by officers and employees of the Company. These shares were valued at the fair market value of $118,025.

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 15,000 shares of common stock for services rendered by the independent members of the Board of Directors as part of their board compensation. These shares were valued at the fair market value of $76,352.

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 26,000 shares of its common stock to employees pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements valued at $131,642.

NOTE 13 – INCENTIVE AND NON-STATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN

Common stock purchase options and warrants consisted of the following:

The following table summarizes information about stock options and warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2015.

The following table summarizes stock grants awarded as compensation:

For the three and six months ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded compensation expense of $248,268 and $326,019 respectively. For the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded compensation expense of $316,370 and $614,293 respectively. The compensation expense related to the unvested stock grants as of December 31, 2015 was $999,847 which will be recognized during the fiscal years of 2016 and 2017.

OPTIONS

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted 152,024 options to employees with exercise prices of $4.14 to $4.92 per share and expiration date of 3 to 5 months, vesting immediately. Using the Black-Scholes method to value the options, the Company recorded $145,716 in compensation expense for these options in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The fair market value was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

NOTE 14 – CONTINGENCIES

As previously disclosed, on July 25, 2014, purported class action lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the Company and certain of its current or former officers and/or directors, which have been consolidated under the caption Rand-Heart of New York, Inc. v. NetSol Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:14-cv-05787 PA (SHx). Plaintiffs subsequently filed consolidated amended complaints, which asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result of the Company’s motions, the Court now has dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims except those related to the scope of the Company’s release of its next generation product, NFS Ascent™, during the narrow proposed class period of October 24, 2013 to November 8, 2013. The Company has filed an answer and affirmative defenses denying the remaining claims.

The Company continues to believe that plaintiffs’ remaining allegations are meritless and intends to vigorously defend all claims asserted. The Company has engaged counsel and has liability insurance. Given the early stage of the litigation, however, at this time the Company is unable to form a professional judgment that an unfavorable outcome is either probable or remote, and it is not possible to assess whether or not the outcome of these proceedings will or will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

On October 27, 2015, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the California state court entitled McArthur v Ghauri, et al., Case No. BC599020 (Los Angeles, Cty.), naming current and former members of the Company’s board of directors as defendants. The complaint alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties based on the same alleged factual premise as the pending federal securities class action described above. The Company is named as a nominal defendant only and no damages are sought from it. In addition, on December 30, 2015, a virtually identical shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in Nevada state court, Paulovits v. Ghauri, et al., Case No. CV15-02470 (Washoe Cty.), which alleges the same claims as the earlier-filed California case.

On January 20, 2016, the parties agreed in principle to settle this class action. Such settlement is in the process of being documented and is subject to the Court’s approval. The Company expects the cost of settlement to be fully covered by its insurers.

NOTE 15 – OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company has identified three segments for its products and services; North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific. Our reportable segments are business units located in different global regions. Each business unit provides similar products and services; license fees for leasing and asset-based software, related maintenance fees, and implementation and IT consulting services. Separate management of each segment is required because each business unit is subject to different operational issues and strategies due to their particular regional location. The Company accounts for intra-company sales and expenses as if the sales or expenses were to third parties and eliminates them in the consolidation.

The following table presents a summary of identifiable assets as of December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015:

The following table presents a summary of operating information for the three and six months ended December 31:

The following table presents a summary of capital expenditures for the six months ended December 31:

NOTE 16 – NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARY

The Company had non-controlling interests in several of its subsidiaries. The balance of non-controlling interest was as follows:

NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES, LIMITED

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, the Company purchased 669,000 shares of common stock of NetSol PK from the open market for $347,623 resulting in a decrease in non-controlling interest from 34.90% to 34.15%.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Plan of Operation

The following discussion is intended to assist in an understanding of the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2015. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information included within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015, and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Forward-Looking Information

This report contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that is based on the beliefs of its management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to its management. When used in this report, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management’s current view of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this report as anticipated, estimated or expected. The Company’s realization of its business aims could be materially and adversely affected by any technical or other problems in, or difficulties with, planned funding and technologies, third party technologies which render the Company’s technologies obsolete, the unavailability of required third party technology licenses on commercially reasonable terms, the loss of key research and development personnel, the inability or failure to recruit and retain qualified research and development personnel, or the adoption of technology standards which are different from technologies around which the Company’s business ultimately is built. The Company does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

Business Overview

NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NasdaqCM: NTWK) is a worldwide provider of IT and enterprise software solutions. We believe that our solutions constitute mission critical applications for our clients as they encapsulate end-to-end business processes, facilitating faster processing and increased transactions.

The Company’s primary source of revenue is the licensing, customization, enhancement and maintenance of its suite of financial applications under the brand name NFS™ (NetSol Financial Suite) and NFS Ascent^TM for leading businesses in the global lease and finance industry.

NetSol’s clients include Dow-Jones 30 Industrials and Fortune 500 manufacturers and financial institutions, global vehicle manufacturers, and enterprise technology providers, all of which are serviced by NetSol delivery locations around the globe.

Founded in 1997, NetSol is headquartered in Calabasas, California. While the Company follows a global strategy for sales and delivery of its portfolio of solutions and services, it continues to maintain regional offices in the following locations:

The Company maintains services, solutions and/or sales specific offices in the USA, England, Germany, Pakistan, Thailand, China and Australia.

NetSol’s offerings include its flagship global solution, NFS™. A robust suite of five software applications, it is an end-to-end solution for the lease and finance industry covering the complete leasing and financing cycle, starting from quotation origination through end of contract transactions. The five software applications under NFS™ have been designed and developed for a highly flexible setting and are capable of dealing with multinational, multi-company, multi-asset, multi-lingual, multi-distributor and multi-manufacturer environments. Each application is a complete system in itself and can be used independently to address specific sub-domains of the leasing/financing cycle. When used together, they fully automate the entire leasing/financing cycle for any size company, including those with multi-billion dollar portfolios.

NFS Ascent™

NFS Ascent™ is the Company’s next-generation platform, offering a technologically advanced solution for the auto and equipment finance and leasing industry. NFS Ascent’s™ architecture and user interfaces were designed based on the Company’s collective experience with global Fortune 500 companies over the past 30 years.  The platform’s framework allows auto captive and asset finance companies to rapidly transform legacy driven technology into a state-of-the-art IT and business process environment.  At the core of the NFS Ascent™ platform is a lease accounting and contract processing engine, which allows for an array of interest calculation methods, as well as robust accounting of multi-billion dollar lease portfolios under various generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), as well as international financial reporting standards (IFRS).  NFS Ascent™, with its distributed and clustered deployment across parallel application and high volume data servers, enables finance companies to process voluminous data in a hyper speed environment. NFS Ascent™ has been developed using the latest tools and technologies and its n-tier SOA architecture allows the system to greatly improve a myriad of areas including, but not limited to, scalability, performance, fault tolerance and security.

LeasePak

In North America, NTA has and continues to develop the LeasePak Productivity modules as an additional companion set of products to operate in conjunction with the LeasePak base system licensed software. LeasePak streamlines the lease management lifecycle, while maintaining customer service and reducing operating costs. It is web-enabled and can be configured to run on HP-UX, SUN/Solaris or Linux, as well as for Oracle and Sybase users. It is scalable from a basic offering to a collection of highly specialized add on modules for systems, portfolios and accrual methods for virtually all sizes and varying complexity of operations. It is part of the vehicle leasing infrastructure at leading Fortune 500 banks and manufacturers, as well as for some of the industry’s leading independent lessors. It handles every aspect of the lease or loan lifecycle, including credit application origination, credit adjudication, pricing, documentation, booking, payments, customer service, collections, midterm adjustments, and end-of-term options and asset disposition. It is also integrated with Vertex Series O.

The LeasePak solution includes the LeasePak Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) business line, which provides an enhanced performance, while reducing the overall cost of ownership. SaaS offers a new deployment option whereby customers only require access to the internet and web browser to use the software. LeasePak-SaaS targets small and mid-sized leasing and finance companies.

NTA has updated the LeasePak’s technology set to .Net. The most recent upgrade includes faster performance, new features, improved security, and compatibility with the latest hardware. LeasePak.Net takes full advantage of the existing business functionality of LeasePak.

LeaseSoft

In addition to offering NFS Ascent™ to the Europe market, NTE has some regional offerings, including LeaseSoft and LoanSoft. LeaseSoft is a full lifecycle lease and finance system aimed predominantly at the UK funder market, including modules to support web portals and an electronic data interchange manager to facilitate integration between funders and introducers. LoanSoft is similar to LeaseSoft, but optimized for the consumer loan market.

The following discussion is intended to assist in an understanding of NetSol’s financial position and results of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2015. It should be read together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein.

Highlights

A few of NetSol’s major successes achieved in the first half of fiscal year 2016 were:

Our success, in the near term, will depend, in large part, on the Company’s ability to continue to grow revenues and improve profits, adequately capitalize for growth in various markets and verticals, make progress in the North American and European markets and, continue to streamline sales and marketing efforts in every market we operate. However, management’s outlook for the continuing operations, which has been consolidated and has been streamlined, remains optimistic.

Management has identified the following material trends affecting NetSol.

Positive trends:

Negative trends:

CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION

Quarter Ended December 31, 2015 compared to the Quarter Ended December 31, 2014

Net revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are broken out among the segments as follows:

The following table sets forth the items in our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 as a percentage of revenues.

Revenues

License fees

License fees for the three months ended December 31, 2015, were $709,691 compared to $2,100,715 for the three months ended December 31, 2014, reflecting a decrease of $1,391,024. During the quarter ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a certain portion of license revenue from the NFS Ascent™ project which was signed during the last fiscal year. The license revenue was recognized on the percentage of completion method based on the services delivered to the customer. We have also recognized license revenue against the implementation of our legacy product at a customer site in China. In addition, we issued additional licenses for our LeasePak product. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, we signed one deal for the implementation of our NFS™ legacy system and added issued additional licenses for our LeasePak product.

Maintenance fees

Maintenance fees for the three months ended December 31, 2015, were $3,272,227 compared to $3,329,587 for the three months ended December 31, 2014, reflecting a decrease of $57,360. Included in the maintenance fee are maintenance provided to related parties of $31,755 for the three months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $53,462 for the same period last year. Maintenance fees begin once a customer has “gone live” with our product. The slight decrease in the maintenance fees is due to exchange rate difference. We anticipate maintenance fees to remain relatively stable until we are able to license NFS Ascent™ to new customers.

Services

Services revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2015 was $12,209,779 compared to $6,922,302 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 reflecting an increase of $5,287,477. Included in the services revenue are services provided to related parties of $2,635,675 for the three months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $1,543,718 for the same period last year. The increase is due to services provided to new customers both for the implementation of the legacy systems and for the implementation of NFS Ascent™ as well as additional services provided to existing customers on account of customization and enhancement requests. Moving forward, with the implementation of new projects of NFS Ascent^TM, we anticipate this element of our revenue to increase more compared to the license fee.

Gross Profit

The gross profit was $8,027,975, for the three months ended December 31, 2015 compared with $5,000,552 for the three months ended December 31, 2014. This is an increase of 60.54% or $3,027,423. The gross profit percentage for the three months ended December 31, 2015 also increased to 49.58% from 40.48% for the three months ended December 31, 2014. The increase in the gross profit is mainly due to the increase in revenues. The cost of sales was $8,163,722 for the three months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $7,352,052 for the three months ended December 31, 2014. As a percentage of sales, cost of sales decreased from 59.52% for the three months ended December 31, 2014 to 50.42% for the three months ended December 31, 2015.

Salaries and consultant fees increased by $626,665 from $4,298,900 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 to $4,925,565 for the three months ended December 31, 2015. The increase in salaries and consultant fees is primarily due to salary increases during 2015. As a percentage of sales, salaries and consultant expense decreased from 34.8% for the three months ended December 31, 2014 to 30.42% for the three months ended December 31, 2015.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $1,461,466 compared to $1,800,753 for the three months ended December 31, 2014, or a decrease of $339,287. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased as some products became fully amortized.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $5,943,206 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared to $6,005,149, for the three months ended December 31, 2014, or a decrease of 1.03% or $61,943. As a percentage of sales, it decreased from 48.61% to 36.71%. This slight decrease in operating expenses was a mix of an increase in selling and marketing expenses of $428,035 or 27.18%, a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $375,078 or 9.59% and a decrease in depreciation expense of $152,387 or 34.79%. The increase in selling and marketing expenses is due to the hiring of additional employees and the increase in marketing efforts for NFS Ascent^TM. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to reduction of legal and professional services.

Income (Loss) from Operations

Income from operations was $2,084,769 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared to loss of $1,004,597 for the three months ended December 31, 2014. This represents an increase of $3,089,366 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared with the three months ended December 31, 2014. As a percentage of sales, net income from operations was 12.88% for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared to loss of 8.13% for the three months ended December 31, 2014.

Other Income and Expenses

Other expense was $53,033 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared to $413,650 for the three months ended December 31, 2014. Included in other expense for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, was an exchange loss of $421,082 on foreign currency exchange transactions compared to $134,527 in the current quarter.

Net Income (Loss)

Net income was $875,065 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared to a loss of $1,367,166 for the three months ended December 31, 2014. This is an increase of $2,242,231 compared to the prior year. Net income per share, basic and diluted, was $0.08 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared to loss per share of $0.14 for the three months ended December 31, 2014.

Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 compared to the Six Months Ended December 31, 2014

Net revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are broken out among the segments as follows:

The following table sets forth the items in our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 as a percentage of revenues.

Revenues

License fees

License fees for the six months ended December 31, 2015 were $1,903,045 compared to $3,685,268 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 reflecting a decrease of $1,782,223. During the six months ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a certain portion of license revenue from the NFS Ascent™ project which was signed during the last fiscal year. The license revenue was recognized on the percentage of completion method based on the services delivered to the customer. We has also recognized license revenue from two new customers for the implementation of our legacy product at customer site in China. During the six months ended December 31, 2014, we signed two different deals for the implementation of our NFS™ legacy system and issued additional licenses for our LeasePak product.

Maintenance fees

Maintenance fees for the six months ended December 31, 2015, were $6,442,696 compared to $6,178,228, for the six months ended December 31, 2014, reflecting an increase of $264,468. Included in the maintenance fee are maintenance provided to related parties of $189,986 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $193,575 for the same period last year. Maintenance fees begin once a customer has “gone live” with our product. The increase was due to the start of new maintenance agreements from customers who went live with our product during the latter stages of fiscal year 2015 and into fiscal year 2016. We anticipate maintenance fees to remain relatively stable until we are able to license NFS Ascent™ to new customers.

Services

Services income for the six months ended December 31, 2015 was $21,151,060 compared to $12,716,259 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 reflecting an increase of $8,434,801. Included in the services income are services provided to related parties of $4,823,083 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $3,088,595 for the same period last year. The increase is due to services provided to new customers both for the implementation of the legacy systems and for the implementation of NFS Ascent™ as well as additional services provided to existing customers on account of customization and enhancement requests. Moving forward, with the implementation of new projects of NFS Ascent^TM, we anticipate this element of our revenue to increase more compared to the license fee.

Gross Profit

The gross profit was $13,438,704, for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared with $8,213,185 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. This is an increase of 63.62% or $5,225,519. The gross profit percentage for the six months ended December 31, 2015 increased to 45.56% from 36.37% for the six months ended December 31, 2014. The cost of sales was $16,058,097 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $14,366,570 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. As a percentage of sales, cost of sales decreased from 63.63% for the six months ended December 31, 2014 to 54.44% for the six months ended December 31, 2015.

Salaries and consultant fees increased by $1,510,338 from $8,415,117 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 to $9,925,455 for the six months ended December 31, 2015. The increase in salaries and consultant fees is due to salary increases during 2015. As a percentage of sales, salaries and consultant expense decreased from 37.27% for the six months ended December 31, 2014 to 33.65% for the six months ended December 31, 2015.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $2,935,701 compared to $3,602,320 for the six months ended December 31, 2014, or a decrease of $666,619. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased as some products became fully amortized.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $11,410,899 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $11,460,303, for the six months ended December 31, 2014 or a decrease of 0.43% or $49,404. As a percentage of sales, it decreased from 50.75% to 38.69%. The decrease in operating expenses was a mix of an increase in selling and marketing expenses of $994,079 or 36.72%, a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $684,787 or 9.03% and a decrease in depreciation expense of $441,988 or 43.38%. The increase in selling and marketing expenses is due to the hiring of additional employees and increased marketing efforts for NFS Ascent^TM. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to reduction of legal and professional services.

Income (Loss) from Operations

Income from operations was $2,027,805 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to loss of $3,247,118 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. This represents an increase of $5,274,923 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared with the six months ended December 31, 2014. As a percentage of sales, net income from operations was 6.87% for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to loss of 14.38% for the six months ended December 31, 2014.

Other Income and Expenses

Other expense was $140,372 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $360,279 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. Included in other income for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was an exchange loss of $341,862 on foreign currency exchange transactions compared to $248,246 in the current period.

Net Income (Loss)

Net income was $464,037 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to a net loss of $3,205,195 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. This is an increase of $3,669,232 compared to the prior year. Net income per share, basic and diluted, was $0.05 and $0.04 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to loss per share of $0.34 for the six months ended December 31, 2014.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our cash position was $13,986,773 at December 31, 2015, compared to $14,168,957 at June 30, 2015.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $2,031,618 for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to $4,024,142 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2015, we had current assets of $33,584,811 and current liabilities of $13,309,439. We had accounts receivable of $11,774,857 at December 31, 2015 compared to $9,972,243 at June 30, 2015. We had revenues in excess of billings of $5,061,568 at December 31, 2015 compared to $5,267,275 at June 30, 2015. During the six months ended December 31, 2015, our revenues in excess of billings were reclassified to accounts receivable pursuant to billing requirements detailed in each contract. The combined totals for accounts receivable and revenues in excess of billings increased by $1,596,907, from $15,239,518 at June 30, 2015, to $16,836,425 at December 31, 2015. The increase in accounts receivable is due to invoicing for services and maintenance fees to various customers. To some customers, the maintenance fee is invoiced in advance for the year. The amount is recorded in unearned revenue and is recognized as revenue on the time proportionate method. Accounts payable and accrued expenses, and current portions of loans and lease obligations amounted to $5,907,103 and $3,767,193, respectively at December 31, 2015.

The average days sales outstanding for the six months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were 100 and 93 days, respectively, for each period. The days sales outstanding have been calculated by taking into consideration the average combined balances of accounts receivable and revenue in excess of billings.

Net cash used by investing activities was $1,167,133 for the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to $2,170,184 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. We had purchases of property and equipment of $1,177,443 compared to $1,772,866 for the comparable period last fiscal year.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $35,628 and $574,569 for the six months ended December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively. The six months ended December 31, 2015 included the cash inflow of $194,680 from the exercising of stock options and warrants compared to $116,400 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. During the six months ended December 31, 2015, we had net payments for bank loans and capital leases of $530,733 compared to $2,867,974 for the six months ended December 31, 2014. We are operating in various geographical regions of the world through its various subsidiaries. Those subsidiaries have financial arrangements from various financial institutions to meet both their short and long term funding requirements. These loans will become due at different maturity dates as described in Note No. 11 of the financial statements. We are in compliance with the covenants of the financial arrangements and there is no default, which may lead to early payment of these obligations. We anticipate paying back all these obligations on their respective due dates from its own sources.

We typically fund the cash requirements for our operations in the U.S. through our license, services, and maintenance agreements, intercompany charges for corporate services, and through the exercise of options and warrants. As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately $13.99 million of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of which approximately $11.47 million is held by our foreign subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2015, we had approximately $14.17 million of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of which approximately $8.97 million is held by our foreign subsidiaries. We intend to permanently reinvest these funds outside the U.S., and therefore, we do not anticipate repatriating undistributed earnings from our non-U.S. operations. If funds from foreign operations are required to fund U.S. operations in the future, and if U.S. tax has not previously been provided, we would be required to accrue and pay additional U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds.

We remain open to strategic relationships that would provide value added benefits. The focus will remain on continuously improving cash reserves internally and reduced reliance on external capital raise.

As a growing company, we have on-going capital expenditure needs based on our short term and long term business plans. Although our requirements for capital expenses vary from time to time, for the next 12 months, we anticipate needing $1.5 to $2.5 million for APAC, U.S. and Europe new business development activities and infrastructure enhancements, which we expect to provide from current operations.

While there is no guarantee that any of these methods will result in raising sufficient funds to meet our capital needs or that even if available will be on terms acceptable to us, we will be very cautious and prudent about any new capital raise given the global market uncertainties. However, we are very conscious of the dilutive effect and price pressures in raising equity-based capital.

Financial Covenants

Our U.K. based subsidiary, NTE, has an approved overdraft facility of £300,000 which requires that the aggregate amount of invoiced trade debtors (net of provisions for bad and doubtful debts and excluding intra-group debtors) of NTE, not exceeding 90 days old, will not be less than an amount equal to 200% of the facility. NTE had been granted another credit facility of £1,000,000 for the VLS acquisition. This facility requires that NTE’s adjusted tangible net worth would not be less than £600,000. For this purpose, adjusted tangible net worth means shareholders’ funds less intangible assets plus non-redeemable preference shares. In addition, NTE’s cash debt service coverage would not fall below 150% of the aggregate debt service cost.

The Pakistani subsidiary, NetSol PK has an approved facility for export refinance from Askari Bank Limited amounting to Rupees 300 million ($2,858,776) which requires NetSol PK to maintain a long term debt equity ratio of 60:40 and the current ratio of 1:1.

As of the date of this report, we are in compliance with the financial covenants associated with our borrowings. The maturity dates of the borrowings of respective subsidiaries may accelerate if they do not comply with these covenants. In case of any change in control in subsidiaries, they may have to repay their respective credit facilities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Critical accounting policies for us include revenue recognition and multiple element arrangements, intangible assets, software development costs, and goodwill.

REVENUE RECOGNTION

The Company recognizes revenue from license contracts without major customization when a non-cancelable, non-contingent license agreement has been signed, delivery of the software has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Revenue from the sale of licenses with major customization, modification, and development is recognized on a percentage of completion method. Revenue from the implementation of software is recognized on a percentage of completion method.

Revenue from consulting services is recognized as the services are performed for time-and-materials contracts. Revenue from training and development services is recognized as the services are performed. Revenue from maintenance agreements is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement, which in most instances is one year.

MULTIPLE ELEMENT ARRANGEMENTS

We may enter into multiple element revenue arrangements in which a customer may purchase a number of different combinations of software licenses, consulting services, maintenance and support, as well as training and development (multiple element arrangements).

Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value for each element is based on the price for which the element is sold separately. We determine the VSOE of fair value of each element based on historical evidence of our stand-alone sales of these elements to third-parties or from the stated renewal rate for the elements contained in the initial software license arrangement. When VSOE of fair value does not exist for any undelivered element, revenue is deferred until the earlier of the point at which such VSOE of fair value exists or until all elements of the arrangement have been delivered. The only exception to this guidance is when the only undelivered element is maintenance and support or other services, then, the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the performance period.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consist of product licenses, renewals, enhancements, copyrights, trademarks, trade names, and customer lists. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over the estimated useful life and are evaluated for impairment at least on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Costs incurred to internally develop computer software products or to enhance an existing product are recorded as research and development costs and expensed when incurred until technological feasibility for the respective product is established. Thereafter, all software development costs are capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalization ceases when the product or enhancement is available for general release to customers.

The Company makes on-going evaluations of the recoverability of its capitalized software projects by comparing the amount capitalized for each product to the estimated net realizable value of the product. If such evaluations indicate that the unamortized software development costs exceed the net realizable value, the Company writes off the amount which the unamortized software development costs exceed net realizable value. Capitalized and purchased computer software development costs are being amortized ratably based on the projected revenue associated with the related software or on a straight-line basis.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Our stock-based compensation expense is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option pricing model and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including expected volatility and expected term. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model changes significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical experience and our expectations regarding future pre-vesting termination behavior of employees. To the extent our actual forfeiture rate is different from our estimate; stock-based compensation expense is adjusted accordingly.

GOODWILL

Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a purchase businesses combination. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may be impaired. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step test. Under the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying value (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and the enterprise must perform step two of the impairment test (measurement). Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, step two does not need to be performed.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTES

For information with respect to recent accounting pronouncements and the impact of these pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks.

None.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management has the responsibility to establish and maintain adequate internal controls over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our external financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

Due to inherent limitations of any internal control system, management acknowledges that there are limitations as to the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and therefore recognize that only reasonable assurance can be gained from any internal control system. Accordingly, our internal control system may not detect or prevent material misstatements in our financial statements and projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. This assessment was based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the results of our assessment, the Company has determined that as of December 31, 2015, there was no material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the six months ended December 31, 2015, that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(f) and 15d – 15(f)).

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

As previously disclosed, on July 25, 2014, purported class action lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the Company and certain of its current or former officers and/or directors, which have been consolidated under the caption Rand-Heart of New York, Inc. v. NetSol Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:14-cv-05787 PA (SHx).  Plaintiffs subsequently filed consolidated amended complaints, which asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  As a result of the Company’s motions, the Court now has dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims except those related to the scope of the Company’s release of its next generation product, NFS Ascent™, during the narrow proposed class period of October 24, 2013 to November 8, 2013.  The Company has filed an answer and affirmative defenses denying the remaining claims.

The Company continues to believe that plaintiffs’ remaining allegations are meritless and intends to vigorously defend all claims asserted.  The Company has engaged counsel and has liability insurance.  Given the early stage of the litigation, however, at this time the Company is unable to form a professional judgment that an unfavorable outcome is either probable or remote, and it is not possible to assess whether or not the outcome of these proceedings will or will not have a material adverse effect on the Company. On January 20, 2016, the parties agreed in principle to settle this class action.  Such settlement is in the process of being documented and is subject to the Court’s approval.  The Company expects the cost of settlement to be fully covered by its insurers.   

On October 27, 2015, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the California state court entitled McArthur v Ghauri, et al., Case No. BC599020 (Los Angeles, Cty.), naming current and former members of the Company’s board of directors as defendants.  The complaint alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties based on the same alleged factual premise as the pending federal securities class action described above.  The Company is named as a nominal defendant only and no damages are sought from it.  In addition, on December 30, 2015, a virtually identical shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in Nevada state court, Paulovits v. Ghauri, et al., Case No. CV15-02470 (Washoe Cty.), which alleges the same claims as the earlier-filed California case.

On January 20, 2016, the parties agreed in principle to settle this class action.  Such settlement is in the process of being documented and is subject to the Court’s approval.  The Company expects the cost of settlement to be fully covered by its insurers.   

Item 1A. Risk Factors

None.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.