Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Accounting Policies (Policies)

Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates


The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The areas requiring significant estimates are provision for doubtful accounts, provision for taxation, useful life of depreciable assets, useful life of intangible assets, contingencies, assumptions used to determine the net present value of operating lease liabilities, and estimated contract costs. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk


Cash includes cash on hand and demand deposits in accounts maintained within the United States as well as in foreign countries. Certain financial instruments, which subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist of cash and restricted cash. The Company maintains balances at financial institutions which, from time to time, may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits for the banks located in the United States. Balances at financial institutions within certain foreign countries are not covered by insurance. As of December 31, 2019, and June 30, 2019, the Company had uninsured deposits related to cash deposits in accounts maintained within foreign entities of approximately $20,260,523 and $16,124,339, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.


The Company’s operations are carried out globally. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments of each country and by the general state of the country’s economy. The Company’s operations in each foreign country are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in economically developed nations. These include risks associated with, among others, the political, economic and legal environments and foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other things.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments


The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820-10 defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. For certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. The carrying amounts of the convertible note receivable and the long-term debt approximate their fair values based on current interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics.


The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:


Level 1: Valuations consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and has the highest priority.
Level 2: Valuations rely on quoted prices in markets that are not active or observable inputs over the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Valuations are based on prices or third party or internal valuation models that require inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement and are less observable and thus have the lowest priority.


The Company’s assets that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019, were as follows:


    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total Assets  
Revenues in excess of billing - long term   $ -     $ -     $ 1,291,025     $ 1,291,025  
Total   $ -     $ -     $ 1,291,025     $ 1,291,025  


The Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2019, were as follows:


    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total Assets  
Revenues in excess of billing - long term   $ -     $ -     $ 1,281,492     $ 1,281,492  
Total   $ -     $ -     $ 1,281,492     $ 1,281,492  


The reconciliation from June 30, 2019 to December 31, 2019 is as follows:


    Revenues in excess of billing - long term     Fair value discount     Total  
Balance at June 30, 2019   $ 1,380,631     $ (99,139 )   $ 1,281,492  
Amortization during the period     -       27,681       27,681  
Effect of Translation Adjustment     (19,808 )     1,660       (18,148 )
Balance at December 31, 2019   $ 1,360,823     $ (69,798 )   $ 1,291,025  


Management analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” Derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as adjustments to fair value of derivatives. The effects of interactions between embedded derivatives are calculated and accounted for in arriving at the overall fair value of the financial instruments. In addition, the fair values of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants and option derivatives are valued using the Black-Scholes model.

New Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements


Recent Accounting Standards Adopted by the Company:


In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This pronouncement requires lessees to recognize a liability for lease obligations, which represents the discounted obligation to make future lease payments, and a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) asset on the balance sheet. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02, along with related clarifications and improvements, as of July 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach, which allows the Company to apply ASC 840, Leases, in the comparative periods presented in the year of adoption. Accordingly, the comparative periods and disclosures have not been restated.


The Company elected the package of practical expedients to not reassess:


  whether a contract is or contains a lease
  lease classification
  initial direct costs


Additionally, the Company adopted the policy election to not recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases for all asset classes.


Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of a non-cash transitional adjustment to ROU assets and lease liabilities of approximately $3,011,814 and $3,091,236, respectively, as of July 1, 2019. The difference between the ROU assets and lease liabilities represented existing deferred rent expense and prepaid rent that were derecognized and adjusted ROU assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 did not materially impact the results of operations or cash flows.


Accounting Standards Recently Issued but Not Yet Adopted by the Company:


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. Under the new standard, goodwill impairment would be measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. This ASU eliminates existing guidance that requires an entity to determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by hypothetically assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those periods. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment test performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company will apply this guidance to applicable impairment tests after the adoption date.


In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. The ASU was issued to address the complexity associated with applying generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. The ASU, among other things, eliminates the need to consider the effects of down round features when analyzing convertible debt, warrants and other financing instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.


All other newly issued accounting pronouncements not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.